Even the China CDC disagrees with the World Health Organization (WHO) investigative team’s leading hypothesis that the Wuhan wet market remains the most likely origins of the COVID pandemic. A team of Chinese scientists in a paper published in the January 24, 2020 British medical journal The Lancet concluded that the wet market was not the source.
At the center of the WHO investigative team, and reported as the “American” representative (although there are no Americans on the team), is British zoologist and renowned frog expert Peter Daszak. Shortly after the outbreak in China, now more than a year ago, Daszak led a team to publish a paper in the February 19, 2020 The Lancet which stated:
“We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”
Boston City Life magazine, in an article published on September 9, 2020, reported it this way:
“Antonio Regalado, biomedicine editor of MIT Technology Review, put it more bluntly. If it turned out COVID-19 came from a lab, he tweeted, ‘it would shatter the scientific edifice top to bottom.’”
Daszak is a beneficiary of millions of U.S. dollars in National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grants for research on bat coronaviruses. He has also been a key conduit for U.S.-China gain-of-function testing, i.e., Frankenstein research to create deadly pathogenic viruses, on behalf of Anthony Fauci, head of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The benefits of gain–of–function experiments have been found dubious at best by a growing number of American scientists.
There are many reasons to suspect that the Wuhan Institute of Virology played a role in the spread of SAR-COV 2. The science, history, and plausible arguments are well documented. For those who are curious, the New York Magazine publication from January 4, 2021, is comprehensive, and the Latham, et al., article is good in terms of scientific references, as are Deigin’s work and Chan’s.
However, as much as Daszak might be seen as sucking up to China by critics, he is, in reality, a typical witless British Crown Agent and Malthusian eco-spook. Perhaps China should take note. After he came to the United States and volunteered for the CDC, he joined and led the Consortium of Conservation Medicine (CCM) beginning in 2004.
CCM, and its successor, EcoHealth Alliance, is a post-modern concoction combining eco-fascism and public health. CCM works to prevent the development of new infrastructure projects within impoverished nations to ostensibly “stop the spread of disease.” This means they prevent development such as energy, water, and sanitation projects, which are the very foundations for the miracle of modern public health. Instead, CCM looks to cultivate a catalogue of potential new viruses while protecting their natural reservoirs.
Here is what their own website says:
“Wild animals like bats and rodents are the natural reservoir for zoonotic pathogens and have carried these pathogens for thousands of years. They are not to blame for these disease emergence events—it is humans who are responsible for altering the environment and increasing contact and conflict with these important species.”
The CCM also places a strong emphasis on bats, especially in southeast Asia and southern China, including how to live with them!
By 2010 Daszak’s Consortium of Conservation Medicine joined with an operation called the Royal Society of Wildlife Trust, which was initially established by Gerald Durrell as The Wildlife Preservation Trust in 1963, and with the Dodo bird as its symbol, is still run from the Crown’s Channel Island of Jersey. The Royal Society of Wildlife Trust, set up in 1999, is now an organization of forty-six different wildlife trusts operated from the Crown’s Channel Islands of Man and Alderney.
The Durrell operation, then and now, has been patronized by Princess Anne, eldest daughter of the Queen, who celebrated her forty years of support for this Huxley-inspired eugenics project with an event on the Isle of Jersey in 2012.
This joining of CCM and Wildlife Preservation became EcoHealth Alliance, which has in turn become a major conduit for British Crown–directed eco-spook activity, especially between the United States and China, with Daszak as its titular head.
Daszak plays a key social role in orchestrating “pandemic preparedness”—which in the real physical world would mean the development of safe and advanced vaccine technology, redundant medical capacity, and advanced infrastructure systems. But in the world of “science–speak,” it means concocting new pathogenic viruses in laboratories. Daszak has clear ties to Shi Zengli, the famous bat researcher at the Wuhan lab who researched the closest strain to COVID (known as RaTG13), from samples that were found in a bat cave as well as within four infected miners, and which killed one, in Yunnan province in 2012. Daszak is tied to Fauci through funding, and helped to conduit money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology on behalf of Fauci’s NIH. Daszak is also tied to Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, who specializes in gain-of-function testing, and Jonna Mazet of the Obama PREDICT program, part of the “pandemic preparedness” operation.
In reality, Daszak is merely just another frog sitting on the lily pad of the globalist swamp. What creatures such as Daszak and his Crown sponsors intend to destroy is the real process of scientific and industrial development on a national and global scale. In short, any nation that wants to survive will reject every aspect of globalism and its intrinsic push for eco-fascism, and will eliminate the role of those like Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance from undermining real economic policy.
Whether the virus was leaked, or occurred naturally, it was the Crown’s globalist regime, as with those at Davos, which benefited from its weaponization. But, the attempt to control populations runs much deeper than the origins of COVID. The ability to pull off such a scam—whether with climate change, or tulip bulbs, or COVID hysteria—is premised upon the destruction of actual science and the creative powers of human thought more broadly.
No literate scientific community would tolerate a Daszak posing as a public health official. In fact, the biased, heavy handed, and unscientific COVID response was only made possible by the broad acceptance of linear forecast models from discredited academics like Brit Neil Ferguson of the Imperial College of London, or the University of Washington/Gates Foundation’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME).
Such models are widely used throughout all scientific fields, from cosmology to climate change—and often consciously used to instigate hysteria and social control—and the underlying methods of linear forecasting models are based on unproven assumptions and have no actual connection to physical reality. If the practitioners of this fraudulent method were exposed, it would shatter the pseudo-scientific edifice top to bottom. (For more on the fraud of linear forecasting, and a discussion on the true science of forecasting, see this paper by Lyndon LaRouche.)
It is the attempted ideological takeover of real science which presents the greatest threat to our civilization, and this has far greater consequences on the Earth than carbon dioxide or the coronavirus could ever have.
Consider what they call “ethics” at any college today: “Imagine you are on a trolley car, and you are about to run over four people, or you can redirect the track and kill only one? Which do you choose, and why?”
British degenerates, like Ms. Foot of the infamous Trolley Problem, have come to dominate American pseudo-science on college campuses, and their ideological program intends nothing less than to destroy the genius and creativity of the American spirit of industry and science, and replace it with apocalyptic ideologies, where all you can do is mitigate the suffering. Think of so-called experts like John Kerry on climate change or Anthony Fauci on COVID.
This hardcore indoctrination began with the direct attempt by British demagogues at the turn of the 20th Century, like Bertrand Russell, who co-wrote an entire book in 1910, Principia Mathematica, trying to prove one plus one equals two via abstract logic, all in the hopes of destroying actual scientific thought and replacing it with linear mathematic models. Russell was closely tied to eugenicists like Julian Huxley, and had the following to say in his “The Impact of Science on Society” in 1952:
“It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment. This subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship…. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray. Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”
And later in that same work:
There are other (means), which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of nationalists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s.
Contrast this with the American spirit as seen during the Great Depression with the Tennessee Valley Authority, then the Eighth Wonder of the World, or during the war years with scientists like Vannevar Bush at MIT, the Manhattan Project, and the Arsenal of Democracy. It was manifest again with Kennedy’s Apollo Moon program, and with President Trump’s Operation Warp Speed for a breakthrough in vaccine technology, and his return to the Moon with NASA’s Artemis project. This is the American can-do attitude which solves real–world problems with entirely new ideas, discoveries, and inventions.
The British and their sycophant acolytes in American colleges have intended to replace this Promethean spirit with a medieval Aristotelian outlook of morbid death and social control, and have been working to do so for more than a century. With psy-ops like Russiagate, Covidgate, climate change, or the election fraud, we merely see the afterbirths of this century-long program.
In short, we need a fundamental shift in the institution of science. With the discovery of fire, economic development became the “king of the sciences,” and without such devotion true science is impossible. Without a moral commitment to the future of mankind, there can be no real science, only “science-speak.”
To recognize the overwhelming benefits for mankind—and to the universe itself through mankind’s exploration—from advancements like industrialization, the use of fossil fuels for abundant electricity, advanced water systems, broadscale use of nuclear fission and eventually fusion power, as well as extraplanetary colonization, is the litmus test for any actual scientist today, and ever. The rest is pseudo-science.
Let the lords of the flies live with frogs, or the bats if they prefer. The rest of us have some discovery to do.