This is how I study and think about it. If one begins with, say, Dammegård's astonishing work on the Palme case (jaw-dropping, I promise you) one can BEGIN to form the correct goggles with which to look upon any putative assassination. It decodes the decepticon, the scope of it...it is just jaw dropping. So, I suggest, don't start with the Kirk case, but start with something "nobody cares about." (anymore.) (But should.)
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/the-murder-of-olof-palme-not-looking
I now see the world through Ole Dammegard
"goggles" and I feel so free.
I withhold my opinion on Charlie Kirk for now because people are too inflamed and histrionic.
It's a virtue signaling orgy.
